Some of the more notable patterns:
B5750 - One of the Suzi Chin dresses |
B5749 - Another Suzi Chin pattern |
5749 Line Drawing |
B5758 - A Maggy London design |
5758 Line - I actually like the back a lot. |
B5752 - Maggy London - not a huge fan of the side pannel ruching here |
B5751 - Maggy London. I actually like the top here. |
And, for the Retro lovers:
B5748 |
B5747 |
I certainly like your picks. The first 2 dresses are especially pretty IMHO. I'm going to dash over and see what else they have. Thanks for the heads up!
ReplyDeleteYeah, I was a bit tired and grumpy when I posted... But looking again I really do like the first three designs here, so I might get them at a sale.
DeleteI really like 5749, but the print they used made it such that I didn't even realize it was a cowl neck (which I love) until I clicked through it to see the line drawings! Who ever put together this collection really did it a disservice- the prints are so busy you can't see the features at all, and most of the dresses look identical, but aren't.
ReplyDeleteThat said, I got 4 new vogue patterns yesterday, so I won't be buying any of these for awhile. 4 vogues = 16 "regular" patterns. I'm a bit cheapskate.
I agree - the prints make them look awful. Or, at least the prints they used. I think the colors are too dark or muddy to transfer well in the photos. It should be a rule to never (or almost never) use black in sample garments... you can't see a thing!
DeleteLooking at these with fresh eyes, I actually do really like the first three designs, so I might look for those at an upcoming sale. But I totally know what you mean about Vogue feeling like a splurge. I find I only buy Vogue if I really like the design. But then I have used more Vogue than Butterick in the past year, so I guess there is that to consider as well...
Yeah, they seem to have gone a bit bonkers with the prints. When I first looked at the new releases it was just a blur of floral and you couldnt actually see any of the style lines. Why do they do that?
Delete5752 is a copy of an Adrianna Papell dress that I knocked off last year using a pattern from that Russian pattern site whose name I can't remember. Sadly I never got to wear it for the happy reason that I lost weight.
ReplyDeleteI like 5749 becuase it's got some shoulder coverage!